United States v. Diego Sanchez (alleged health care fraud case)

After an almost 4 week trial, the jury found Diego Sanchez not guilty on all seven counts of health care fraud and wire fraud in the Southern District of Florida.

A few days earlier, Judge Rudy Ruiz granted a judgment of acquittal on two other counts (money laundering and conspiracy to pay kickbacks).

Diego and his codefendant, Milo Caskey, owned a laboratory in Texas called Innovative Genomics, or IGx. There were two other owners of the lab, Nikita Hermesman and Enrique Perez-Paris. After Nikita pleaded guilty for his conduct related to another lab, he started cooperating against the owners of IGx. And the govt indicted Enrique, Diego and Milo for billing $65 million in genetic testing and COVID-19 testing. Nadir Perez and Omar Palacios were also indicted — they ran pop-up tents in Miami for COVID testing. The government’s theory was that the lab was paying doctors and paying pop-up tents for medically unnecessary genetic and covid tests. They ran over 400,000 PCR tests during the pandemic.

Diego Sanchez had no background in labs, but was recruited to start up the lab by his childhood best friend, Enrique. He was recruited because he had a strong background and finance and was very detail oriented.

Diego and Enrique operated in a joint defense for six months, preparing for trial. About a week before trial, Enrique, who is represented by Ryan Stumphauzer and Matt DellaBetta , decided to plead guilty and flip on his childhood friend, Diego. Omar Palacios also pleaded about a week before trial and cooperated against Diego. Nadir Perez had pled guilty months earlier. Diego and Milo were the last two standing.

Nikita Hermesman was the govt’s first witness and Enrique was their last witness (testifying for 3 days). In between, Nadir and Omar testified, along with expert witnesses, patients, and govt analysts.

Lauren Krasnoff and David Oscar Markus defended Diego Sanchez, who presented a good faith defense. They argued that Diego relied on lawyers (Greenberg Traurig), scientists, doctors, and billers and believed that all of the tests were medically necessary. Instead of relying on reasonable doubt, they argued to the jury that Diego was actually innocent. They took the very risky strategy of waiving attorney client privilege and joint defense privilege at trial, giving the government access to all of the materials from the lawyers and the joint defense.

After the jury reached its verdict, Judge Ruiz commented that the jury was the most attentive that he had seen as a judge in his 13 years on the bench.

“We are so happy for Diego, who had the courage to fight this case even after his friend turned against him and lied to try and save his own skin. We are thankful to the judge and the jury for giving us a fair shake and the opportunity to prove Diego’s innocence.”

David Oscar Markus and Lauren Krasnoff,
partners at Markus/Moss

Lauren gave an incredible opening statement and crossed a number of witnesses, including Omar and Stephen Quindoza (the govt expert who has testified over 100 times for the govt). David closed and crossed Nikita and Enrique.

Lauren Krasnoff, left, and David Oscar Markus, right, attorneys at Markus/Moss, with their client, Diego Sanchez, center.

Lauren Krasnoff, left, and David Oscar Markus, right, attorneys at Markus/Moss, with their client, Diego Sanchez, center.

Podcast

After the win, David Lat had David Markus on his podcast to discuss the trial and other stories.

United States v. Dr. Ali Shaygan (alleged pill mill case).

Dr. Shaygan and David Oscar MarkusOne of the Firm’s signature cases, David Oscar Markus led the defense team to another first of its kind victory — not guilty verdicts across the board on 141 counts against a doctor charged in federal court with selling pain medications in a “pill mill” prosecution. 

After a month long trial, the jury acquitted on all counts in less than a half a day, and after they announced the verdict, the jury hugged the lawyers and client.  (Here’s the Sun-Sentinel article (pdf) and the Herald article (pdf)). Markus was able to show that this was not a pill mill at all. In addition to the acquittal, Markus uncovered prosecutorial misconduct and the federal judge heard two days of testimony from prosecutors and agents, after which the court ordered the government to pay Dr. Shaygan and his lawyers over $600,000.

 The Eleventh Circuit reversed the fee award, with several dissenting opinions, which generated a great deal of press including this National Law Journal article (pdf).  Since this case, the Firm is regularly consulted on cases involving doctors and pharmacists charged with cases involving pain medication such as oxycodone, oxycontin, hydrocodone, and so on. For example, the Firm recently represented the owner of Robert’s, a pharmacy chain in Florida, and currently represents a number of doctors. Both state authorities and the federal government have cast way too wide a net in the prosecution of doctors and pharmacists who are engaged in legitimate medical practice, and the Firm takes great pride in defending these cases. 

David recently spoke to other criminal defense lawyers on how to win pill-mill prosecutions in the Fall.

Pictured: Dr. Shaygan and David walking into court during trial.

State of Florida v. Gale Fontaine (alleged gambling prosecution).

In the first case of its kind to proceed to trial in the State of Florida, Mr. Markus obtained a not guilty verdict in the trial of a businesswoman, Gale Fontaine, who had been charged with running a gambling house.

The State had charged Ms. Fontaine and a number of other operators of “senior arcades”, places where senior citizens could play machines for low stakes. The other operators cut deals, but Mr. Markus obtained the first not guilty verdict in this area after a trial that was vigorously prosecuted by the State of Florida and covered daily by the local media. 

Here is the article (pdf) covering the verdict, which was on the front page of the Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel.  Since this case, Markus has been the go-to lawyer for advice on how to legally operate arcades in Florida. Below is the picture from the Sentinel which was prominently placed above the fold on the front page.

David Markus and his client at the not guilty verdict in State of Florida v. Gale Fontaine (alleged gambling prosecution).

More Not Guilty Verdicts

After obtaining this not guilty verdict, the Firm has handled a number of other high-profile and high-stakes cases alleging gambling, including recent internet cafe charges involving over 50 defendants. David Markus and Margot Moss obtained a dismissal for their client and business owner, Mazen Salloum, before the trial in that matter.

United States v. Rodrigo Hidalgo (criminal antitrust case).

Criminal antitrust case.

In a total victory for our client, David Oscar Markus along with Mona Markus successfully obtained the dismissal of two indictments against the Vice President of an airline.

The charges involved allegations of federal criminal antitrust laws violations by conspiring to fix fuel surcharge prices on air cargo shipments to and from the U.S. The team obtained a dismissal of the first indictment after demonstrating their client’s lack of participation in the conspiratorial meeting. With regard to the second indictment, the team filed a unique motion demonstrating that the VP was simultaneously an employee of another airline which meant that he was covered under the grant of immunity in that airline’s plea agreement.

The DOJ fought hard against the motion, filing 9 pleadings in opposition and calling multiple witnesses to testify in support of their position. After a two day evidentiary hearing, the Magistrate Judge wrote a 49-page order granting the motion to dismiss, and the District Court affirmed.

The Hidalgo case was part of a string of pre-trial dismissals that the Firm recently has obtained. Other cases include United States v. Brian Cooper (CEO of large company charged in two cases discussed below), State v. Rene Pedrayes (executive in RICO case discussed below), United States v. Juan Gomez (money laundering case discussed below), United States v. Mazen Salloum (gambling case discussed above) and State v. Jeffrey Lipman (a pain medication case, which was dismissed pre-trial).

Obtaining a not guilty verdict is rare.  Obtaining a dismissal pre-trial is even rarer. The creative and aggressive approach of the Firm has led to these unique results.

United States v. Dr. Michael Bahrami (alleged kickback conspiracy).

After a three day trial, a federal jury unanimously found Dr. Michael Bahrami not guilty in Federal Court before Judge Cecilia Altonaga. 

Dr. Bahrami was charged in a one count indictment with conspiracy to defraud the United States and to accept kickbacks and bribes in exchange for referring patients to home health agencies. The jury deliberated for less than an hour before finding him not guilty.

Dr. Bahrami fled Iran when he was 17 years old. He taught himself English working as a bus boy. He then put himself through medical school and did his internship at Mt. Sinai hospital. He is 61 years old and has a successful cardiology practice. He is married with two small children, 7 and 9 years old. Throughout the trial, the courtroom was packed with his patients who all support him and say he is the best doctor around. He, his wife, and his patients wept after the trial.

Here’s the Herald Article (pdf).

Pictured: Dr. Michael Bahrami celebrates his acquittal with his wife, and his lawyers, David Oscar Markus and Lauren Doyle. 

Dr Michael Bahrami with his wife and legal team from Markus Moss PLLC